Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Shocking Accessories FAIL | Choice of Advertiser FAIL Next »
» See all 22 comments
Leave a Reply
Popular Videos
-
Recent Failures in Communications
Xebi on Hipster Qualifications FA… macboy on Gas Station FAIL Tanner on Gas Station FAIL BigDan715 on Gas Station FAIL ClariPossum on Hipster Qualifications FA… ClariPossum on Hipster Qualifications FA… ClariPossum on Open Toe FAIL Mike on French FAIL alkaholik ian on Gas Station FAIL Mike on French FAIL
Says more about whomever gave her the gun than her.
Whomever it is needs a swift kick in the jeans.
I’m sure she can take responsibility for her own actions.
That’s the best lesson in “hold the gun like you mean it” she’ll ever get.
Not trying to troll you but that comment in of itself is sexist. There’s just no way she bought that gun on her on then went to fire it for the first time with her friend filming? A woman just couldn’t have her own interest in guns and own one. Obviously someone else gave this to her.
As MDZ says, she can take responsibility for her own actions. And its entirely possible this isn’t anyone else’s fault.
Overall though, this is hilarious. Plus a gun makes it easier for her to kill things that are quick, like a chicken. For chicken pot pies of course.
see, what is pathetic about arguments from people with prejudiced socio-political opinions (such as yourself) is their self-righteousness blinds them to their own hypocrisy.
-
Lets look at what was said:
“Says more about whomever gave her the gun than her.
Whomever it is needs a swift kick in the jeans.”
-
Go on, read it again. Do you see any gender specific indicators other than those identifying the person firing the gun….? no, no you don’t.
In fact that statement could easily be suggesting that a WOMAN with an interest in guns gave it to the person firing it. It is interestingly bigoted of you to assume that this must have been a comment indicating a man gave her the gun.
-
….Or maybe you are going to side-step that landmine by suggesting you merely think that the comment is sexist because it suggests she must not have her own interest in guns because she is a woman. …except it doesn’t state that at all.
.
In fact, for anyone who hasn’t come to that post with a prejudice which taints their interpretation of it, it is assumed she has no interest in guns herself as she clearly DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO USE THEM.
-
IT HIT HER IN THE FACE.
-
Moreover, I am no expert but that looks like a Desert Eagle .50. Not exactly a ‘my first handgun’ is it? It is very powerful and very expensive. Even if she had an interest in guns, it’s clearly in its infancy (as she doesn’t know how to use them) and so it is VERY unlikely this would be the gun she would choose for herself. Also, she is obviously totally unfamiliar with it to be so unprepared for the kickback.
-
Every aspect of this video suggests that someone else has given her that weapon to use.so really, the only thing that shows any prejudice or bigotry here is your reaction.
Old video is old.
BUT IT’S BEEN MADE INTO A GIF!!
Old is always better!
A little recoil there?
Sexist title fail.
Agreed.
And totally laughable.
Her first mistake was trying to make a sandwich out of bullets and a gun. Her second mistake was trying to fire a sandwich. Just fail on top of fail. I don’t know why any would think the title is sexist though. There seems to be no mention of her gender.
WTF else do you think it’s supposed to mean, idiot?
Not as easy as it looks in the movies, is it?
There is an entire subgenre of firearms called “ladies’ guns’: There is a reason for this.
Now, that’s sexist. Or, at least it seems to be-women are perfectly capable of using a full-sized weapon. Some people are a little intimidated by larger calibers, so you get them a smaller weapon. I have a friend who’s about 5 feet tall who fired the DEagle and 500 and managed to not hit herself in the face. This girl’s problem is that she didn’t know or wasn’t told to hold the weapon firmly with both hands-also, your elbows are improperly braced if they bend that easily-gut that size should life your arms at the shoulders.
Oi…”gun that size”
Yeah I have a friend who fires a .50 cal rifle better than most guys. BUT the point of the “ladies” guns are for fools like this girl who obviously was not aware that big guns just might have a bit of recoil. It’s fools like her that end up getting guns banned because of poor training. She is firing left handed and bracing as if right handed. That means that in all likelihood, she won’t have proper control of the firearm. Of course that egg she gets on her forehead might be a handy reminder that she needs to hold a firearm properly.
Weaver. Ever hear of him, and his stance? Of the modified Weaver?
This person just flat didn’t know what they had in her hands. Even though her gun-hand elbow is locked. Noob doesn’t need to shoot without proper instruction.
(former CHL instructor)
Hopefully those guns are intended for the amateur ladies who simply aren’t smart enough to know there’s recoil to a real firearm.
That’s a funny looking kitchen.